Before starting anti-TNF agents, patients underwent screening for LTBI, including a postero-anterior chest radiograph and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay (Cellestis GmbH, QIAGEN Inc. both in patients and controls. The addition of anti-TNF agents induced a significant decrease of both the IFN response and of CD25/CD134, whereas no effect on the intensity of the proliferative response was observed. Our data provide a biological basis for the reassuring issues on the safety of long-term anti-TNF treatment in patients with IMID. Introduction Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drives the early cytokine cascade at sites of inflammation1. TNF-targeted biological therapy with monoclonal antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol) or soluble receptors (etanercept) dramatically changed the course of several chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis (PsO), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)2. Most of the favorable outcomes of these agents have been attributed to their ability to antagonize LY-2584702 tosylate salt the effects of TNF at late steps of the inflammatory cascade3. TNF antagonists have been assessed for immune system effects, including assays of cells from treated patients. Previous studies reported that these drugs suppress cytokine production by circulating effector T cells4C11, although an enhanced synthesis of TNF and interferon (IFN) by T cells upon stimulation has also been reported12. Likewise, Bos specific antigens and incorporate an internal positive control (phytohaemagglutinin, PHA), which tests the ability of T cells to produce IFN15. A recent meta-analysis showed that glucocorticoids, oral immunosuppressants and biological therapy produce more negative, but not indeterminate, IGRA results16. However, only five studies on CCR1 anti-TNF agents were included in this meta-analysis17C21 and, among these, only two were performed in patients with autoimmune diseases, in which a clinical evaluation was done without a determination of the biological effects of anti-TNF agents on IGRA outcome18,19. Therefore, we decided to clarify the effect of long-term anti-TNF therapy on T cell effector function in subjects with rheumatologic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID). To this purpose, we LY-2584702 tosylate salt performed multiple investigations comprising IFN secretion by means of an IGRA assay, and T cell proliferation and surface co-expression of CD25 and CD134 in response to PHA. Furthermore, we examined the impact of anti-TNF biological therapy with etanercept (Eta) or adalimumab (Ada) on the functional capacity of T cells. Methods Study population Starting from 2008, we conducted a longitudinal, prospective, observational study on patients with IMID referring to the rheumatology outpatient clinic at Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, and candidates to an anti-TNF agent as their first biological treatment. Before starting anti-TNF agents, patients underwent screening for LTBI, including a postero-anterior chest radiograph and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay (Cellestis GmbH, QIAGEN Inc. Valencia, CA, USA), one of the currently available IGRAs. The original population consisted of 102 patients who were initially studied to assess possible QFT-GIT conversions and reversions in relation to the clinical outcome during the initial 18 months of treatment with biological therapy22. Thirty-three of these patients were also involved in another study with the aim to analyse CD4+ T cells by multi-functional flow cytometry during a total of 36-month follow-up of their treatment with biological therapy23. Among patients of this last group, only those continuing biological treatment for at least 8 years were included in the current study. At established time points, taken before (T0) and after 1 (T1), 2 (T2), 4 (T4), and 8 (T8) years since the onset of anti-TNF agents, blood samples were collected from IMID subjects to measure the IFN secretion. Blood samples obtained after 8 years of biological therapy were used to perform the proliferation LY-2584702 tosylate salt assay, together with the co-expression of CD25/CD134 assay. These two tests, as well as the IFN secretion, were also performed in a group of healthy donors (HD). At the same time as the blood draws, in patients with IMID disease activity was calculated.